Daftar Jurnal Penerbit Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Focus and Scope The aim of this journal publication is to disseminate the conceptual thoughts or ideas and research results that have been achieved in the area of community services.Abimanyu particularly focuses on the main problems in the development of the sciences of community services areas as follows:Student Community Services;Economics science;Technology;Art and Humanities;Education for Sustainable Development.

ABOUT THE JOURNALABISATYA: Journal of Community Engagement focuses on the dissemination of outcomes from community service activities that embody the application of academic knowledge, technology, arts, and innovation to empower society. The journal welcomes manuscripts that highlight sustainable practices, empowerment models, and the implementation of solutions addressing real-life challenges faced by communities. The journal covers a wide range of disciplines related to community development and social empowerment, including but not limited to: Education and Literacy Development Science and Technology Application for Society Appropriate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Social and Humanities Empowerment Language, Arts, and Cultural Preservation Communication and Media for Social Change Socioeconomic and Cooperative Development Sports, Health, and Well-being Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities ABISATYA encourages the submission of manuscripts that demonstrate collaboration between universities, local governments, industries, and communities. The journal particularly values articles that emphasize participatory approaches, capacity building, knowledge transfer, and sustainable community impact aligned with national development goals and the spirit of Tri Dharma Perguruan Tinggi.   Articles submitted to ABISATYA: Journal of Community Engagement will undergo the following process: Initial ScreeningThe Journal Manager will conduct an initial review to ensure the article aligns with the journal's scope and meets eligibility criteria. A plagiarism check will also be performed using Turnitin. Editorial ReviewIf the article passes the initial screening, it will be assigned to the editorial board based on the field of expertise for review of both substance and editorial quality. The editorial board will only review manuscripts/articles relevant to ABISATYA's scope, subject to editorial approval. Author RevisionsArticles that have been reviewed for substance and editorial quality will be returned to the authors for necessary revisions. Authors are expected to make the revisions promptly and resubmit the article via the Open Journal System (OJS). The process of review, return to authors, and resubmission will continue as needed. CopyeditingOnce the review and revision process is complete, the article will enter the copyediting stage, managed by the Journal Manager. Production and PublicationAfter copyediting, the article will proceed to the production stage, where it will be finalized and prepared for publication. This structured process ensures the quality and integrity of articles published in ABISATYA: Journal of Community Engagement. Publication FrequencyABISATYA Journal is published twice a year (June and December) Open Access PolicyThis journal provides open and free access to its content, adhering to the principle of facilitating readers' access to information on community service research for scientific development. SponsorsThe Institute for Research and Community ServiceUniversitas Negeri Surabaya Sources of SupportThe Institute for Research and Community ServiceUniversitas Negeri Surabaya Journal HistoryABISATYA: Journal of Community Engagement is published by Universitas Negeri Surabaya. The journal was first launched in 2023. It publishes a variety of studies encompassing research in Education, Science, Technology, Appropriate Innovation, Social Humanities, Language, Arts, Culture, Communication, Socioeconomics, Sports, and Disability Studies for Community Service.

Adornata: Ethnobeauty and WellnessAn International Journal on Culture-Based Beauty and Holistic HealthAdornata: Ethnobeauty and Wellness comes from the word "Adornata" which means to decorate or beautify. "Ethnobeauty" refers to beauty based on culture and tradition, and "Wellness" emphasizes holistic health. Thus, the meaning and intent of the name of this journal is: humans who are able to decorate or beautify with an emphasis on holistic health based on culture or tradition. Title : Adornata: Ethnobeauty and Wellness Editor in Chief : M. Mamduh Winangun DOI Prefix : 10.26740/adonarta Publisher : Cosmetology Education, Campus 5 Magetan, Universitas Negeri Surabaya Frequency : June and December ISSN Online : 3110-4967

Focus and Scope AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi, a reputable national journal (SINTA 2), accepts articles on any accounting-related subjects and any research methodology that meet the standards established for publication in the journal. The primary, but not exclusive, audiences are academicians, graduate students, practitioners, and others interested in accounting research. AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi accepts research articles in the field of accounting that specifically discuss the implementation of accrual concepts as follow: Financial Accounting Corporate Governance Accounting Education Ethics and Professionalism Market Based Accounting Research Auditing Taxation Public Sector Accounting Sharia Accounting Accounting Information System AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi welcomes papers with the above aims and scopes. The editorial board decides on papers to be published in AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi after review by reviewers appointed by the board. Authors will be advised of reviewers' comments and suggestions. Peer Review Process The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated in the office, whether it is suitable for AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw and similiarity score by using Turnitin. The manuscript will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers (Double Blind Review). Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses. The suggested decision will be evaluated in an editorial board meeting. Afterwards, the editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author. Review Outcomes Utilizing feedback from the peer review process, the Editor will make a final publication decision. The review process will take approximately 4 to 12 weeks. Decisions categories include: Reject - Rejected manuscripts will not be published and authors will not have the opportunity to resubmit a revised version of the manuscript to AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi. Resubmit for Review– The submission needs to be re-worked, but with significant changes, may be accepted. However, It will require a second round of review. Accept wtih Revisions - Manuscripts receiving an accept-pending-revisions decision will be published in AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi under the condition that minor/major modifications are made. Revisions will be reviewed by an editor to ensure necessary updates are made prior to publication. Accept - Accepted manuscripts will be published in the current form with no further modifications required. Publication Frequency AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi is a peer-reviewed journal that is managed and published by Department of Accounting, Universitas Negeri Surabaya. It is published periodically (twice a year) in April and October. Open Access Policy This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. All articles published on AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi are open access by following the Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license. Full license can be found here. Journal Scientific Statement The articles published in AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi are scientifically proved the following the ethics code of scientific publication. The ethics code itself upholds three values of ethics in publications, namely, (1) Neutrality (free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications); (2) Justice (giving the right of authorship to the beneficiary as the author); and (3) Honesty (free from duplication, fabrication, falsification and plagiarism) in the publication. The articles published also follow the certain procedures or orders, such as double blind review and revision process that consistent with the journals regular review, to ensure that the quality is maintained properly. Anti-Plagiarism Policy Papers submitted to AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi will be screened for plagiarism using Turnitin plagiarism detection tools. It will immediately reject papers leading to plagiarism or self-plagiarism. Before submitting articles to reviewers, those are first checked for similarity/plagiarism tool, by a member of the editorial team. The papers submitted to AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi  must have similarity level less than 15%. Plagiarism is the exposing of another persons thoughts or words as though they were your own, without without permission, credit, or acknowledgment, or because of failing to cite the sources properly. Plagiarism can take diverse forms, from literal copying to paraphrasing the work of another. In order to properly judge whether an author has plagiarized, we emphasize the following possible situations: An author can literally copy another authors work- by copying word by word, in whole or in part, without permission, acknowledge or citing the original source. This practice can be identified through comparing the original source and the manuscript/work who is suspected of plagiarism. Substantial copying implies for an author to reproduce a substantial part of another author, without permission, acknowledge or citation. The substantial term can be understood both in terms of quality as quantity, being often used in the context of Intellectual property. Quality refers to the relative value of the copied text in proportion to the work as a whole. Paraphrasing involves taking ideas, words or phrases from a source and crafting them into new sentences within the writing. This practice becomes unethical when the author does not properly cite or does not acknowledge the original work/author. This form of plagiarism is the more difficult form to be identified. Publication Ethics and Malpractice Policy Statement of professional ethical codes is a statement of the ethical codes of all parties involved in the process of publication of this scientific journal (Editors, Peer-reviewers, and Authors). In general, the publication ethics of the AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi refers to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) about Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editor and Peraturan Kepala LIPI Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 about the Ethical Codes of Scientific Publication. Essentially, the code of ethics itself upholds three values of ethics in publications, namely: Neutrality (free from conflicts of interest in public management), Justice (giving the right of authorship to the beneficiary as the author), and Honesty (free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in the publication. DUTIES OF EDITORS Publication Decisions The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Fair Play An editor evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy. Confidentiality The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. DUTIES OF REVIEWERS Contribution to Editorial Decisions Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and, through the editorial communications with the author, may also assist the author in improving the paper. PromptnessAny selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.Confidentiality Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Standards of Objectivity Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. Acknowledgement of Sources Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. DUTIES OF AUTHORSReporting Standards Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable. Originality and Plagiarism The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication An author should not publish manuscripts describing the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable. Acknowledgement of Sources Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Authorship of the Paper Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Fundamental Errors in Published Works When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. Ethical Oversight Suppose the research work involves chemicals, humans, animals, procedures, or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use. In that case, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript to obey the ethical conduct of research using animals and human subjects. Authors must provide legal and ethical clearance from the association or legal organization if required. If the research involves confidential data and business/marketing practices, authors should justify this matter whether the data or information will be hidden securely or not. ALLEGATIONS OF RESEARCH MISCONDUCT Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, citation manipulation, or plagiarism in producing, performing, or reviewing research and writing the article by authors or reporting research results. When authors are found to have been involved with research misconduct or other serious irregularities involving articles that have been published in scientific journals, Editors have a responsibility to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the scientific record. AKRUAL carries a Comments and Criticism section, which provides a forum for expressing different viewpoints, comments, clarification, correction of misunderstandings, and reporting research misconduct regarding topics in published papers. Journal readers are earnestly invited to contribute their ideas to this forum. In cases of suspected misconduct, Editorial Board will use the best practices of COPE to assist them to resolve the complaint and address the misconduct fairly. This will include an investigation of the allegation by the editors. A submitted manuscript that is found to contain such misconduct will be rejected. In cases where a published paper is found to contain such misconduct, a retraction can be published and will be linked to the original article. WITHDRAWAL OF MANUSCRIPTS General Policy of Article Withdrawal It is a general principle of scholarly communication that the editor of a journal is solely and independently responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal shall be published. In making this decision, the editor is guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. An outcome of this principle is the importance of the scholarly archive as a permanent, historical record of the transactions of scholarship. Articles that have been published shall remain as extant, exact, and unaltered as possible. However, occasionally, circumstances may arise where an article is published that must later be retracted or removed. Such actions must not be undertaken lightly and can only occur under exceptional circumstances. In addition, author (s) (and/or their institution) will be punished for any article withdrawal in the form of an article submission ban (temporary up to permanent ban) This policy has been designed to address these concerns and consider current best practices in the scholarly and library communities. As standards evolve and change, we will revisit this issue and welcome the input of scholarly and library communities. We believe these issues require international standards. All of the Article Withdrawal Policies in AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi (including Withdrawal of Manuscripts, Article in Press, Article Retraction, Article Removal, and Article Replacement Policies) are adopted from Elsevier's Article Withdrawal Policy. Article Withdrawal by Author(s) Author(s) are not allowed to withdraw an article that has been sent to AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi because the withdrawal of the article wastes the resources, time, and effort that Editor and Peer-reviewers do in processing the article. Suppose the author is still requesting the withdrawal of the article. In that case, the author will be punished in the form of a ban on the submission of a manuscript for (maximum) 6 numbers (3 volumes or three years) for the manuscript withdrawal in the review process. However, it is highly unethical to withdraw a manuscript that has been sent from a journal because another journal has accepted it. The withdrawal of the article after the manuscript has been accepted for publication is extremely unethical. The author will be given a punishment in the form of being banned on the submission of a manuscript for (maximum) 20 numbers (10 Volumes or ten years). Withdrawal of the manuscript in this policy includes the submission of article revisions that exceed the time limit specified by the editor and does not immediately notify the editor and/or revise the manuscript. If the author does not revise the manuscript by the deadline without confirmation, the author can be banned for (maximum) 12 numbers (6 volumes or six years). Authors who make more than one manuscript withdrawal can be banned permanently. This banning may also be applied to the author's institution. The Editorial Board can publicly announce through the AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi page and/or provide information to other journal editors or other publishers when the Editorial Board is performing the banning processes in these cases. ARTICLE RETRACTION Infringements of professional, ethical codes (such as multiple submissions, bogus claims of authorship, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data, or the like) are forbidden in this journal. Occasionally, a retraction will be used to correct errors in submission or publication. The retraction of an article by its authors or the editor under the advice of members of the scholarly community has long been an occasional feature of the learned world. A number of library and scholarly bodies have developed standards for dealing with retractions, and this best practice is adopted for article retraction by this journal. The editor will investigate the infringements of professional, ethical codes deeply. The Editorial Board will notify the author (s) about the alleged violation along with its proof and offer the options that can be executed by the author (s). If the editor cannot contact the author within the prescribed period, the editor will discuss this problem with other Editors and Editorial Advisory Board. The standard of article retraction in this journal are: A statement (letter) of article retraction, entitled “Retracted: (article title)”, will be issued by the journal's editorial board in two languages (Indonesian and English). The retraction letter of this article (along with evidence, comments, criticism, or a request from the member(s) of the scientific community) is placed on the previous page of the article with the same page number as the first page of the article and given the additional code "vol-ed-1" for the first page of the letter and so on (e.g., 56-ed-1, 56-ed-2, etc.). The original version of the article will be given a "Retracted" watermark or stamp and placed after the letter. This new PDF file is made to replace the original PDF file article. The abstract of the article on the AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi website is replaced with a statement about retracted of the article because it violates the ethical code and/or this journal policy. In contrast, the keyword of the article is deleted. The retraction letter of the article will also be published in this journal on the edition when the article and the letter are issued as part of the Comments and Criticism section. ARTICLE REMOVAL: LEGAL LIMITATIONS In an extremely limited number of cases, it may be necessary to remove an article from the online database. This will only occur where the article is defamatory or infringes others' legal rights, or where the article is, or the editor has good reason to expect it will be, the subject of a court order, or where the article, if acted upon, might pose a severe health risk. In these circumstances, while the metadata (Title and Authors) will be retained, the text will be replaced with a screen indicating the article has been removed for legal reasons. ARTICLE REPLACEMENT In cases where the article, if acted upon, might pose a serious health risk, the authors of the original article may wish to retract the flawed original and replace it with a corrected version. In these circumstances, the procedures for retraction will be followed with the difference that the database retraction notice will publish a link to the corrected re-published article and a history of the document. Articles in Press Articles in Press on AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi is articles that have been accepted for publication in this journal but have not yet been assigned to specific issues (volume and number). Articles in Press can also be the articles that have been assigned to specific issues, but the issue has not been published yet. They are a great way to read about the latest developments in a certain research area before articles are officially published. Please note that the DOI in the Article in Press is still not active until the issue is officially published. There are three types of Articles in the Press on AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi: Accepted manuscripts (AM) - These are articles that have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication by AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi Editorial Member but have not yet been copyedited or formatted in this journal style. Uncorrected proofs (UP) - Uncorrected proofs have been copyedited and formatted but are not finalized and may still be corrected by the authors so that the text could change before final publication. Corrected proofs (CP) - Corrected proofs contain authors' and proofreaders' corrections and may or may not have a specific issue and page numbers. Articles in Press that include errors, or are discovered to be accidental duplicates of other published article(s), or are determined to violate AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi publishing ethics guidelines in the view of the editors (such as multiple submissions, bogus claims of authorship, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data or the like), maybe "Withdrawn" from AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi. Withdrawn means that the article content (HTML and PDF) is removed and replaced with an HTML page and PDF simply stating that the article has been withdrawn according to the AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi Policy on Article in Press Withdrawal with a link to the current policy document. Articles that are "withdrawn" in Articles in Press will not be published in AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi. Internal Policy Editors, Peer-reviewers, and Proofreaders of AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi are permitted to submit an article to this journal with the following conditions: Editors, Peer-reviewers, and Proofreaders of AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi who submit an article to this journal will be released temporarily from the editorial processes starting from the time of submitting the article. This policy goes into the publication decision of the article (received without revision, received with minor revision, received with major revision, or rejected) at least 1 issue/number. Editors, Peer-reviewers, and Proofreaders of AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi who submit an article are not allowed to intervene in the editorial process on editions/numbers when the article is sent to tis journal. Any editorial process will be performed by other Editors, Peer-reviewers, and Proofreaders so that the process continues without any problems. There is no special treatment for Editors, Peer-reviewers, and Proofreaders of AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi who submit an article to this journal. Journal Scientific Statement The articles published in AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi are scientifically proven following the ethics code of scientific publication. The ethics code itself upholds three values of ethics in publications, namely, (1) Neutrality (free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications); (2) Justice (giving the right of authorship to the beneficiary as the author); and (3) Honesty (free from duplication, fabrication, falsification and plagiarism) in the publication. The published articles also follow specific procedures or orders, such as double-blind review and revision processes consistent with the journal's regular review, to ensure that the quality is maintained properly.   Archiving AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi is deposited in multiple digital archives to guarantee long­-term digital preservation. These archives include: 1. Indonesian Scientific Journal Database (ISJD) Neo 2. Indonesia One Search 3. Garuda (Garda Rujukan Digital) Journal History AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi published by Accounting Department, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Surabaya. This journal was first published in October 2009 with ISSN (Print) 2085-9643. The journal is published offline (printed) from the first to the eighth height volume. Then, in 2016, AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi was Published online (with OJS) at https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/aj. 

-

Focus and Scope Al-Uqud: Journal of Islamic Economics, an international journal, provides a forum for publishing quality research in the areas of Islamic Economics and Business, Islamic Banking and Finance. The journal encompasses peer reviewed original research articles (only selected or invited authors), in area including: Islamic Economics Islamic Economics Law Islamic Business Management (Human Resource, Marketing, Halal Supply Chain, and Enterprise System) Islamic Banking and Finance Islamic Philantrophy (Zakat, Infaq, Shodaqoh, and Waqf) Islamic Business Ethics and Entrepreneurship Islamic Insurance The journal accepts theoretical and empirical based manuscripts Peer Review Process All manuscripts submitted must be within the focus and scope of the journal and follow the Author Guidelines of set by the journal. The submitted manuscripts must fulfil scientific merit with novelty appropriate to the focus and scope of the journal. All manuscripts submitted must be written in excellent and academic English language. Non-native authors are encouraged to have their paper checked its grammar and clarity before submission. English language and copyediting services can be provided by International Science Editing and Asia Science Editing. The work must not have been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. All submitted manuscripts must be free from plagiarism contents. All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection software to do the similarity checking (please use Turnitin or iThenticate to check the similarity). Editors will also check the similarity of manuscripts in this journal by using a Turnitin or iThenticate software. The submitted manuscripts to this journal will be peer-reviewed at least 2 (two) or more expert reviewers from Peer-Reviewers Team. The reviewers give valuable scientific comments improving the contents of the manuscript. Sometimes (if required) a third peer-reviewer is needed to give critical comments to the submitted manuscript. The review process used in this journal is a blind review system. The final decision of manuscript acceptance is solely made by Editor in Chief (together with Editorial Board is required for consideration) according to reviewers critical comments. The final decision of the manuscript is solely based on the Editor and Editorial Board final review, which considering peer-reviewers comments (but not solely by Reviewer). Editor in Chief will make a publication of accepted articles including the assigning the article to the published issue by considering the sequence of accepted date and geographical distribution of authors as well as a thematic issue.   Open Access Policy his journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative    Budapest Open Access Initiative  An old tradition and a new technology have converged to make possible an unprecedented public good. The old tradition is the willingness of scientists and scholars to publish the fruits of their research in scholarly journals without payment, for the sake of inquiry and knowledge. The new technology is the internet. The public good they make possible is the world-wide electronic distribution of the peer-reviewed journal literature and completely free and unrestricted access to it by all scientists, scholars, teachers, students, and other curious minds. Removing access barriers to this literature will accelerate research, enrich education, share the learning of the rich with the poor and the poor with the rich, make this literature as useful as it can be, and lay the foundation for uniting humanity in a common intellectual conversation and quest for knowledge. For various reasons, this kind of free and unrestricted online availability, which we will call open access, has so far been limited to small portions of the journal literature. But even in these limited collections, many different initiatives have shown that open access is economically feasible, that it gives readers extraordinary power to find and make use of relevant literature, and that it gives authors and their works vast and measurable new visibility, readership, and impact. To secure these benefits for all, we call on all interested institutions and individuals to help open up access to the rest of this literature and remove the barriers, especially the price barriers, that stand in the way. The more who join the effort to advance this cause, the sooner we will all enjoy the benefits of open access. The literature that should be freely accessible online is that which scholars give to the world without expectation of payment. Primarily, this category encompasses their peer-reviewed journal articles, but it also includes any unreviewed preprints that they might wish to put online for comment or to alert colleagues to important research findings. There are many degrees and kinds of wider and easier access to this literature. By "open access" to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly acknowledged and cited. While  the peer-reviewed journal literature should be accessible online without cost to readers, it is not costless to produce. However, experiments show that the overall costs of providing open access to this literature are far lower than the costs of traditional forms of dissemination. With such an opportunity to save money and expand the scope of dissemination at the same time, there is today a strong incentive for professional associations, universities, libraries, foundations, and others to embrace open access as a means of advancing their missions. Achieving open access will require new cost recovery models and financing mechanisms, but the significantly lower overall cost of dissemination is a reason to be confident that the goal is attainable and not merely preferable or utopian. To achieve open access to scholarly journal literature, we recommend two complementary strategies.  I.  Self-Archiving: First, scholars need the tools and assistance to deposit their refereed journal articles in open electronic archives, a practice commonly called, self-archiving. When these archives conform to standards created by the Open Archives Initiative, then search engines and other tools can treat the separate archives as one. Users then need not know which archives exist or where they are located in order to find and make use of their contents. II. Open-access Journals: Second, scholars need the means to launch a new generation of journals committed to open access, and to help existing journals that elect to make the transition to open access. Because journal articles should be disseminated as widely as possible, these new journals will no longer invoke copyright to restrict access to and use of the material they publish. Instead they will use copyright and other tools to ensure permanent open access to all the articles they publish. Because price is a barrier to access, these new journals will not charge subscription or access fees, and will turn to other methods for covering their expenses. There are many alternative sources of funds for this purpose, including the foundations and governments that fund research, the universities and laboratories that employ researchers, endowments set up by discipline or institution, friends of the cause of open access, profits from the sale of add-ons to the basic texts, funds freed up by the demise or cancellation of journals charging traditional subscription or access fees, or even contributions from the researchers themselves. There is no need to favor one of these solutions over the others for all disciplines or nations, and no need to stop looking for other, creative alternatives. Open access to peer-reviewed journal literature is the goal. Self-archiving (I.) and a new generation of open-access journals (II.) are the ways to attain this goal. They are not only direct and effective means to this end, they are within the reach of scholars themselves, immediately, and need not wait on changes brought about by markets or legislation. While we endorse the two strategies just outlined, we also encourage experimentation with further ways to make the transition from the present methods of dissemination to open access. Flexibility, experimentation, and adaptation to local circumstances are the best ways to assure that progress in diverse settings will be rapid, secure, and long-lived. The Open Society Institute, the foundation network founded by philanthropist George Soros, is committed to providing initial help and funding to realize this goal. It will use its resources and influence to extend and promote institutional self-archiving, to launch new open-access journals, and to help an open-access journal system become economically self-sustaining. While the Open Society Institute's commitment and resources are substantial, this initiative is very much in need of other organizations to lend their effort and resources. We invite governments, universities, libraries, journal editors, publishers, foundations, learned societies, professional associations, and individual scholars who share our vision to join us in the task of removing the barriers to open access and building a future in which research and education in every part of the world are that much more free to flourish. February 14, 2002Budapest, Hungary Leslie Chan: Bioline InternationalDarius Cuplinskas: Director, Information Program, Open Society InstituteMichael Eisen: Public Library of ScienceFred Friend: Director Scholarly Communication, University College LondonYana Genova: Next Page FoundationJean-Claude Guédon: University of MontrealMelissa Hagemann: Program Officer, Information Program, Open Society InstituteStevan Harnad: Professor of Cognitive Science, University of Southampton, Universite du Quebec a MontrealRick Johnson: Director, Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC)Rima Kupryte: Open Society InstituteManfredi La Manna: Electronic Society for Social Scientists István Rév: Open Society Institute, Open Society ArchivesMonika Segbert: eIFL Project consultant Sidnei de Souza: Informatics Director at CRIA, Bioline InternationalPeter Suber: Professor of Philosophy, Earlham College & The Free Online Scholarship NewsletterJan Velterop: Publisher, BioMed Central Content Licensing, Copyright and Permissions Al-Uqud have CC-BY or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work. In developing strategy and setting priorities,al-uqud recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre. Al-Uqud is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License   Scientific Statement The articles published in Al-Uqud are scientifically proved, which follow the code of ethics in scientific publication. The code of ethics it self upholds three values of ethics in publications, namely, (1) Neutrality (free from conflicts of interest in public management). (2) Justice (giving the right of authorship to the beneficiary as the author). (3) Honesty (free from duplication, fabrication, falsification and plagiarism (DF2P) in the publication. The articles published also following certain procedures or orders, such as double-blind review and revision process that consistent with the journals regular review, to ensure that the quality is maintain properly. Publication Ethic Statement Publication Ethics and Allegations of Research Misconduct al-Uqud: Journal of Islamic Economics is a peer-reviewed international journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal as well as allegations of research misconduct, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer­­­­­ and the publisher (Universitas Negeri Surabaya). This statement is based on COPEs Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.     Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed al-Uqud journal is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is, therefore, important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society.   Universitas Negeri Surabaya as the publisher of al-Uqud: Journal of Islamic Economics takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously, and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. Also, the Department of Islamic Economics Universitas Negeri Surabaya and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.   Allegations of Research Misconduct Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, citation manipulation, or plagiarism in producing, performing, or reviewing research and writing an article by authors, or in reporting research results. When authors are found to have been involved with research misconduct or other serious irregularities involving articles that have been published in scientific journals, Editors have a responsibility to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the scientific record. In cases of suspected misconduct, the Editors and Editorial Board will use the best practices of COPE to assist them to resolve the complaint and address the misconduct fairly. This will include an investigation of the allegation by the Editors. A submitted manuscript that is found to contain such misconduct will be rejected. In cases where a published paper is found to contain such misconduct, a retraction can be published and will be linked to the original article. The first step involves determining the validity of the allegation and an assessment of whether the allegation is consistent with the definition of research misconduct. This initial step also involves determining whether the individuals alleging misconduct have relevant conflicts of interest.  If scientific misconduct or the presence of other substantial research irregularities is a possibility, the allegations are shared with the corresponding author, who, on behalf of all of the coauthors, is requested to provide a detailed response. After the response is received and evaluated, additional review and involvement of experts (such as statistical reviewers) may be obtained. For cases in which it is unlikely that misconduct has occurred, clarifications, additional analyses, or both, published as letters to the editor, and often including a correction notice and correction to the published article are sufficient.  Institutions are expected to conduct an appropriate and thorough investigation of allegations of scientific misconduct. Ultimately, authors, journals, and institutions have an important obligation to ensure the accuracy of the scientific record. By responding appropriately to concerns about scientific misconduct, and taking necessary actions based on evaluation of these concerns, such as corrections, retractions with replacement, and retractions, al-Uqud journal will continue to fulfill the responsibilities of ensuring the validity and integrity of the scientific record. Publication decisions The editor al-Uqud: Journal of Islamic Economics is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. Complaints and Appeals Al-Uqud journal will have a clear procedure for handling complaints against the journal, Editorial Staff, Editorial Board or Publisher. The complaints will be clarified to a respected person with respect to the case of complaint. The scope of complaints includes anything related to the journal business process, i.e. editorial process, found citation manipulation, unfair editor/reviewer, peer-review manipulation, etc. The complaint cases will be processed according to COPE guideline. The complaint cases should be sent by email to: [email protected] Fair play An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. Confidentiality The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. Disclosure and conflicts of interest Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Duties of Reviewers Contribution to Editorial Decisions  Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Promptness  Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Confidentiality  Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorised by the editor. Standards of Objectivity  Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. Acknowledgement of Sources  Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest  Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. Duties of Authors Reporting standards  Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable. Data Access, Retention and Reproducibility Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data, if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication. Authors are responsible for data reproducibility. Originality and Plagiarism  The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication  An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable. Acknowledgement of Sources  Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Authorship and Contributorship of the Article Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest  All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Fundamental errors in published work  When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the authors obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. Ethical Oversight  If the research work involves chemicals, human, animals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript in order to obey ethical conduct of research using animals and human subjects. If required, Authors must provide legal ethical clearance from association or legal organization.  If the research involves confidential data and of business/marketing practices, authors should clearly justify this matter whether the data or information will be hidden securely or not.  Intelectual Property (Copyright Policy) Journal policy about intelectual property or copyright is declared here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dpu_igSGViELo6yeQHFdPhjjb-W2mDnm/view Peer-Review Process Policy Peer-Review process/policy is declared here:  https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jie/about/editorialPolicies#peerReviewProcess Post-Publication Discussions and CorrectionsAl-Uqud al-Uqud journal accepts discussion and corrections on published articles by reader. In case the reader giving discussions and corrections toward a published article, the reader can contact by email to Editor in Chief by explaining the discussions and corrections. If accepted (by Editor in Chief), the discussions and correction will be published in next issue as Letter to Editor. Respected Authors can reply/answer the discussions and corrections from the reader by sending the reply to Editor in Chief. Therefore, Editors may publish the answer as Reply to Letter to Editor.    ------------------------------ Ahmad Ajib Ridlwan Editor-in-Chief of al-Uqud: Journal of Islamic Economics   Abstracting and Indexing Google Scholar DOAJ Dimension Publons SINTA ISJD Neo Moraref One Seach Indonesia Academia Edu Article Retraction Infringements of professional ethical codes (such as multiple submission, bogus claims of authorship, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data, or the like) is forbidden in AL-UQUD. Occasionally, a retraction will be used to correct errors in submission or publication. The retraction of an article by its authors or the editor under the advice of members of the scholarly community has long been an occasional feature of the learned world. Standards for dealing with retractions have been developed by a number of library and scholarly bodies, and this best practice is adopted for article retraction by AL-UQUD. The editor will investigate deeply about the infringements of professional ethical codes. The AL-UQUD Editorial Member will notify the Author(s) about the alleged violation along with its proof and offer the options that can be executed by the Author(s). If the Editor is unable to contact the author within the prescribed period, the Editor will discuss with other Editor and Editorial Advisory Board about this problem. The standard of article retraction in AL-UQUD are: A statement (letter) of article retraction, entitled "Retraction: (article title)", signed by the Author(s) and/or Editors and (minimum 1) Editorial Advisory Board. The retracted letter will be issued by the AL-UQUD Editorial Member in two languages (Indonesian and English). The letter of this article (along with evidence, comments, criticism, or request from the member(s) of the scientific community) is placed on the previous page of the article with the same page number as the first page of the article and given the additional code "ed-1" for the first page of the letter and so on (e.g., 56-ed-1, 56-ed-2, etc.). The original version of the article will be given a "Retracted" watermark or stamp and placed after the letter. This new PDF file is made to replace the original PDF file article. The abstract of the article on the AL-UQUD's website is replaced with a statement about retracted of the article because violating the ethical code and/or AL-UQUD policy while the keyword of the article is deleted. The retracted letter of the article will also be published in AL-UQUD on the edition when the letter issued as part of the Front Matter. Sponsors Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Apron: Journal of Performing Arts Thought that accommodates critical and academic thinking through various approaches and perspectives. Online Journal of the S-1 Study Program in Drama, Dance and Music Education - Faculty of Language and Arts UNESA.  Focus and Scope: Critical thinking/ideas about the Performing Arts Creation / study of performing arts Open Access Policy This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Aquaculture and Aquatic Sciences welcomes original research articles, short communications in the multidisciplinary fields of aquaculture and aquatic sciences encompassing: aquaculture; aquaculture engineering; management in aquaculture; aquaculture nutrition; disease & immunology; fish biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology; fish physiology & endocrinology; genetic engineering & biotechnology of aquatic organisms; aquatic biology, environment, and ecology; aquatic ecological conservation and restoration techniques; aquatic organisms biodiversity. Aquatic sciences studies examining interactions among geological, microbial, biological, chemical, physical, hydrological, and societal processes, as well as studies assessing land-water, air-water, benthic-pelagic, river-ocean, lentic-lotic, and groundwater-surface water interactions are also welcomed. The emphasize of the studies are the tropical regions and tropical biodiversity. Aquaculture and Aquatic Sciences published three issues per volume, each year.

Asean Journal Of Halal Study, a journal that focuses on the field of halal studies (food, medicine, cosmetics, media, entertainment, finance, fashion and halal tourism).  Peer review process   open access policy   focus and scope   copyright notice   privacy statement