Daftar Jurnal Penerbit Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Journal Title  Jurnal Ekonomika dan Bisnis Islam ISSN/E-ISSN  2686-620X DOI Prefix  10.2670 Editor in Chief  Ach. Yasin Publisher  Program Studi Ekonomi Islam Universitas Negeri Surabaya Frequency  April, August, December Jurnal Ekonomika dan Bisnis Islam is a peer-reviewed open-access journal that aims to publish manuscripts of high-quality research as well as conceptual analysis that studies specific fields of contemporary issues in Islamic economics, such as Islamic Finance, Islamic Social Finance, Islamic Business, and Ethical Economics. This journal was established in 2018, published three times a year, on April, August and December.

Focus and Scope Jurnal Ekonomi Pendidikan dan Kewirausahaan is a scientific publication that publishes scientific articles of research, study, and development in the field of economic education in Indonesia. This scientific journal contains research articles related to the study of economics, entrepreneurship, and education in Indonesia.The scope of the field of study is as follows: Economics Education Entrepreneurship Education Development of learning materials, teaching models, and learning media Economics learning strategies Educational Economics   Peer Review Process The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated in the office, whether it is suitable for Jurnal Ekonomi Pendidikan dan Kewirausahaan focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw and similarity score by using Turnitin. The manuscript will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers (blind peer review). Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses. The suggested decision will be evaluated in an editorial board meeting. Afterward, the editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author. The Editor will make a final publication decision using feedback from the peer review process. The review process will take approximately 4 to 12 weeks. Decisions categories include: Reject - Rejected manuscripts will not be published, and authors will not have the opportunity to resubmit a revised version of the manuscript to Jurnal Ekonomi Pendidikan dan Kewirausahaan. Resubmit for Review– The submission needs to be reworked, but with significant changes, may be accepted. However, It will require a second round of review. Accept with Revisions - Manuscripts receiving an accept-pending-revisions decision will be published in Jurnal Ekonomi Pendidikan dan Kewirausahaan under the condition that minor/major modifications are made. Revisions will be reviewed by an editor to ensure necessary updates are made prior to publication. Accept - Accepted manuscripts will be published in the current form with no further modifications required.   Publication Frequency Jurnal Ekonomi Pendidikan dan Kewirausahaan is published twice a year (one volume two numbers) with the number of the article of approximately 18 articles.   Open Access Policy Jurnal Ekonomi Pendidikan dan Kewirausahaan is available openly and is free for all readers. Readers can access in full the entire article published by JEPK free of charge. The editors also do not charge for free submission fees, and peer reviews. Anti Plagiarism The submitted article must not contain plagiarism. The editorial team will scan the plagiarism content of the article using the help of the Trunitin application subscribed by  Universitas Negeri Surabaya Sponsors This journal is sponsored by Asosiasi Profesi Pendidik Ekonomi Indonesia (ASPROPENDO) ASPROPENDO Journal History Jurnal Ekonomi Pendidikan dan Kewirausahaan Journal of Education Economics and Entrepreneurship (JEPK) published offline since April 2013. JEPK is published periodically twice a year. Volumes I to III have only published print versions. In June 2016 first published print version as well as the online version at URL address: http://jurnalepk.web.id/, then in March 2017 done a migration to URL address: https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index .php / jepk. Since Volume 5.1 will only be published online with OJS. Since 4 April 2019 (Number 10/E/KPT/2019) Since Volume 11 No 1, 2023 accredited Sinta 2 Since Volume 12 Number 2 of 2024 JEPK only publishes articles in English and charges a fee to the author

-

Focus and Scope GETER : Jurnal Seni Drama, Tari dan Musik is a Performing Arts Journal that accommodates critical and academic thinking through various approaches and perspectives. Focus dan Scope : · Drama, dance and music education · Critical thoughts/ideas about Performing Arts · Creation of performing arts information jurnal Journal Title: GETER : Jurnal Seni Drama, Tari dan Musik Initials: GETER Frequency: 2 issues 1 year (April and October) Online ISSN: 2655-2205 Editor in Chief: Indar Sabri DOI: 10.26740/geter Publisher: Universitas Negeri Surabaya in collaboration with: ASOSIASI PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN SENDRATASIK(SENI DRAMA TARI DAN MUSIK) INDONESIA (AP2SENI), surat perjanjian (MOU AP2SENI)    Publication Frequency 2 issues 1 year (April and October) Open Access Policy This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Jurnal Gizi dan Kesehatan Nusantara is a scientific jurnal managed by Nutrition Departement of Universitas Negeri Surabaya. This journal aims to publish research articles, literature reviews, and case reports in the field of nutrition and health. We are committed to contributing to the advancement of nutritional science by disseminating high-quality research findings relevant to societal needs. The journal is published four times a year and accepts articles from academics, practitioners, and researchers from various institutions. All submitted articles undergo a peer-review process by independent experts in the field.

Focus and Scope Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen (JIM) covers management science studies, including: 1. Marketing Management;2. Human Resource Management;3. Financial Management;4. Strategic Management; and5. Entrepreneurship. Peer Review Process The editorial board of Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen has established a policy review process as follows : All manuscripts submitted to this journal must follow Focus and Scope and Author Guidelines of this journal. The submitted manuscripts must fulfil scientific merit or novelty appropriate to the focus and scope of this journal.  All submitted manuscripts must be free from plagiarism contents. All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection softaware to do the similarity checking (please use Turnitin or iThenticate to check the similarity). Editors will also check the similarity of manuscripts in this journal by using a Turnitin or iThenticate software.  The submitted manuscripts to this journal will be peer-reviewed at least 2 (two) or more expert reviewers from Reviewer Acknowledgement. The reviewers give scientific valuable comments improving the contents of the manuscript. Sometimes (if required) a third peer-reviewer is needed to give critical comments to the submitted manuscript. The review process used in this journal is blind review system. Final decision of manuscript acceptance is solely made by Editor in Chief (together with Editorial Board if required for consideration) according to reviewers critical comments. The final decision of manuscript is solely based on the Editor and Editorial Board final review which considering peer-reviewers comments (but not solely by Reviewer). Publication of accepted articles including the assigning the article to published issue will be made by Editor in Chief by considering sequence of accepted date and geographical distribution of authors as well as thematic issue.  Publication Frequency JIM terbit empat kali dalam setahun pada Maret, Juni, September, dan Desember. Open Access Policy his journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative    Budapest Open Access Initiative  An old tradition and a new technology have converged to make possible an unprecedented public good. The old tradition is the willingness of scientists and scholars to publish the fruits of their research in scholarly journals without payment, for the sake of inquiry and knowledge. The new technology is the internet. The public good they make possible is the world-wide electronic distribution of the peer-reviewed journal literature and completely free and unrestricted access to it by all scientists, scholars, teachers, students, and other curious minds. Removing access barriers to this literature will accelerate research, enrich education, share the learning of the rich with the poor and the poor with the rich, make this literature as useful as it can be, and lay the foundation for uniting humanity in a common intellectual conversation and quest for knowledge. For various reasons, this kind of free and unrestricted online availability, which we will call open access, has so far been limited to small portions of the journal literature. But even in these limited collections, many different initiatives have shown that open access is economically feasible, that it gives readers extraordinary power to find and make use of relevant literature, and that it gives authors and their works vast and measurable new visibility, readership, and impact. To secure these benefits for all, we call on all interested institutions and individuals to help open up access to the rest of this literature and remove the barriers, especially the price barriers, that stand in the way. The more who join the effort to advance this cause, the sooner we will all enjoy the benefits of open access. The literature that should be freely accessible online is that which scholars give to the world without expectation of payment. Primarily, this category encompasses their peer-reviewed journal articles, but it also includes any unreviewed preprints that they might wish to put online for comment or to alert colleagues to important research findings. There are many degrees and kinds of wider and easier access to this literature. By "open access" to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly acknowledged and cited. While  the peer-reviewed journal literature should be accessible online without cost to readers, it is not costless to produce. However, experiments show that the overall costs of providing open access to this literature are far lower than the costs of traditional forms of dissemination. With such an opportunity to save money and expand the scope of dissemination at the same time, there is today a strong incentive for professional associations, universities, libraries, foundations, and others to embrace open access as a means of advancing their missions. Achieving open access will require new cost recovery models and financing mechanisms, but the significantly lower overall cost of dissemination is a reason to be confident that the goal is attainable and not merely preferable or utopian. To achieve open access to scholarly journal literature, we recommend two complementary strategies.  I.  Self-Archiving: First, scholars need the tools and assistance to deposit their refereed journal articles in open electronic archives, a practice commonly called, self-archiving. When these archives conform to standards created by the Open Archives Initiative, then search engines and other tools can treat the separate archives as one. Users then need not know which archives exist or where they are located in order to find and make use of their contents. II. Open-access Journals: Second, scholars need the means to launch a new generation of journals committed to open access, and to help existing journals that elect to make the transition to open access. Because journal articles should be disseminated as widely as possible, these new journals will no longer invoke copyright to restrict access to and use of the material they publish. Instead they will use copyright and other tools to ensure permanent open access to all the articles they publish. Because price is a barrier to access, these new journals will not charge subscription or access fees, and will turn to other methods for covering their expenses. There are many alternative sources of funds for this purpose, including the foundations and governments that fund research, the universities and laboratories that employ researchers, endowments set up by discipline or institution, friends of the cause of open access, profits from the sale of add-ons to the basic texts, funds freed up by the demise or cancellation of journals charging traditional subscription or access fees, or even contributions from the researchers themselves. There is no need to favor one of these solutions over the others for all disciplines or nations, and no need to stop looking for other, creative alternatives. Open access to peer-reviewed journal literature is the goal. Self-archiving (I.) and a new generation of open-access journals (II.) are the ways to attain this goal. They are not only direct and effective means to this end, they are within the reach of scholars themselves, immediately, and need not wait on changes brought about by markets or legislation. While we endorse the two strategies just outlined, we also encourage experimentation with further ways to make the transition from the present methods of dissemination to open access. Flexibility, experimentation, and adaptation to local circumstances are the best ways to assure that progress in diverse settings will be rapid, secure, and long-lived. The Open Society Institute, the foundation network founded by philanthropist George Soros, is committed to providing initial help and funding to realize this goal. It will use its resources and influence to extend and promote institutional self-archiving, to launch new open-access journals, and to help an open-access journal system become economically self-sustaining. While the Open Society Institute's commitment and resources are substantial, this initiative is very much in need of other organizations to lend their effort and resources. We invite governments, universities, libraries, journal editors, publishers, foundations, learned societies, professional associations, and individual scholars who share our vision to join us in the task of removing the barriers to open access and building a future in which research and education in every part of the world are that much more free to flourish. February 14, 2002Budapest, Hungary Leslie Chan: Bioline InternationalDarius Cuplinskas: Director, Information Program, Open Society InstituteMichael Eisen: Public Library of ScienceFred Friend: Director Scholarly Communication, University College LondonYana Genova: Next Page FoundationJean-Claude Guédon: University of MontrealMelissa Hagemann: Program Officer, Information Program, Open Society InstituteStevan Harnad: Professor of Cognitive Science, University of Southampton, Universite du Quebec a MontrealRick Johnson: Director, Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC)Rima Kupryte: Open Society InstituteManfredi La Manna: Electronic Society for Social Scientists István Rév: Open Society Institute, Open Society ArchivesMonika Segbert: eIFL Project consultant Sidnei de Souza: Informatics Director at CRIA, Bioline InternationalPeter Suber: Professor of Philosophy, Earlham College & The Free Online Scholarship NewsletterJan Velterop: Publisher, BioMed Central Journal Sponsorship PublisherFakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Surabaya Website: https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jimEmail: [email protected] in collaboration with: Aliansi Program Studi Manajemen dan Bisnis Indonesia (APSMBI) Anti-Plagiarism Policy All articles submitted to JIM (Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen) must be the original work (free of plagiarism). The submitted article has never existed in any media and/or is not being or will be submitted in any medias. The author is responsible for the authenticity of the submitted manuscript. All incoming articles will be checked for authenticity to prevent plagiarism by using Turnitin anti-plagiarism software. Any forms of high-level plagiarism will be banned (temporary up to permanent banned). Publication Ethics In general, the ethics of publication JIM (Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen) refers to COPE. Statement scientific code of conduct is an expression of the code of conduct of all parties involved in the process of scientific journal publications, namely managers, editors, bestari partners, and author / writer. The statement's code of ethics of scientific publications by LIPI Chief Regulation No. 5 of 2014 on the Code of Ethics of Scientific Publications, which basically Scientific Publication Ethics Code is essentially upholds ethical values in three publications, namely Neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the management of the publication;  Justice, which gives the right to authorship entitled as author / writer; and  Honesty, which is free of duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in the publication.   ETHICAL STANDARDS FOR THE EDITOR 1. Decisions Publications JIM (Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen) Editor is responsible for deciding which articles will be published on the articles received. This decision was based on the validation of an article and the article contributions for researchers and readers. In doing so, Editor guided by the policy of the editorial board and is subject to the laws need to be enforced as defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Editors can discuss with other editors or reviewers in making the decision. 2.      Assessment Objective  Editor conduct an evaluation of a script based on the intellectual content without discrimination of religion, ethnicity, race, gender, race, and others. 3.      Confidentiality  Editors and editorial staff can not disclose any information about the manuscript that has been accepted to anyone, other than the authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, and the editorial board. 4.      Conflicts of Interest  The material sent to the accrual article has not been published and may not be used for personal research include the editor without the written permission of the author. Information or ideas obtained through a  double blind review  must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Editors should refuse to review the manuscript if the editor has a conflict of interest, which is due to the competitive relationship, collaborative, or other relationships with the author, company, or institution related to the manuscript. 5.      Cooperation in the Investigation  Editors must take responsive measures if there are complaints related to ethics on a manuscript that has been received or the articles that have been published. Editors can contact the author of the script and give due consideration to the complaint. Editors can also communicate more to institutions or agencies related research. When the complaint has been resolved, matters such as the publication of a correction, withdrawal, expression of concern, or other records, should be considered to be done.   ETHICAL STANDARDS FOR THE REVIEWER 1. Contributions to the Decision Editor Blind peer review  by the reviewer assist editors in making decisions and can assist the author in improving writing through editorial communication between the reviewer with the author. Peer review  is an important component in the formal scientific communication ( formal scholarly communication ) and a scientific approach.   2.      Timeliness  If the reviewer is assigned feel qualified to conduct a review of a manuscript or knows that it is impossible to conduct a review in a timely manner, the reviewer assigned must immediately notify the editor. 3.      Confidentiality  Each manuscript has been accepted for review must be treated as confidential documents. Tesebut manuscript should not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor. 4.      Objective  Reviews should be conducted objectively. Critics of a personal nature on the author is not appropriate. Reviewers should be clearly expressed his views along with the arguments in favor. 5.      Completeness and Authenticity References  Reviewers should identify works of publications that have not been cited by the author. A statement of observations or arguments previously published should be accompanied by relevant quotes. Reviewers must notify the editor on substantial similarity or  overlap  between the manuscript was in-review with other writings that have been published, in accordance with the knowledge reviewer. 6.      Conflicts of Interest  Articles unpublished material should not be used in personal research reviewer without including the written permission of the author. Information or ideas obtained through  peer review  must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should reject the manuscript review if the reviewer has a conflict of interest, which is due to the competitive relationship, collaborative, or other relationships with the author, company, or institution related to the work.   ETHICAL STANDARDS FOR AUTHORS 1.      Standard Writing  Authors must present papers / articles are accurate to the research conducted as well as presenting an objective discussion on the significance of the research. The research data must be presented accurately in the article. An article should be sufficiently detailed with adequate reference to enable others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or inaccurate presentation of papers that constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. 2.      Data Access Research  Authors may be asked to provide raw data on paper to be reviewed and should be able to provide public access to such data if possible, and should be able to store the data in a reasonable period of time after publication. 3.      Originality and Plagiarism  Plagiarism in all forms constitute unethical behavior in the publication of scientific works and unacceptable. Authors must ensure that all work presented an original work, and if the authors have used the work and / or words of others, the writer must present the appropriate citations. There are various forms of plagiarism, as acknowledging the writings of others into writing your own, copy or rewrite substantial parts of the works of others without citing sources, as well as claiming the results of research conducted by others. Self-Plagiarism or bibs plagiarism is a form of plagiarism. Oto plagiarism is cite or sentences of his own works were published without citing sources. 4.      Terms of Delivery Posts  The author may not publish the same script on more than one journal. Asking the same script on more than one journal is a publication of unethical behavior in scientific papers and unacceptable. 5.      Inclusion Reference Source  Recognition correctly on the work of others must always be done. Authors must mention influential publications in the preparation of his work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, may not be used or reported without written permission from the source of the information. 6.      Authorship  The author is a person who has contributed sigifikan to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the writing in the article. All the parties who have made significant contributions listed as  co-author . Authors of correspondence should ensure that all  co-authors  have included in the script, and all the  co-authors  have read and approved the final version of the work, and has approved the submission of the manuscript for publication. 7.      Error in writing Posted  When the authors found a significant error or inaccuracy in his work have been published, the author is responsible to promptly notify the journal editor, as well as working with the editor to retract or correct the text. If the editor to obtain information from third parties that a work containing kesalahaan significant publication, the author bears responsibility to immediately withdraw or make corrections to the text editor or give evidence related to the accuracy of the original writings. Abstracting and Indexing Google Scholar SINTA Garuda Sponsors Universitas Negeri Surabaya Journal History Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen terbit secara online sejak 2013 di laman https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jim. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen terbit empat kali dalam setahun pada Maret, Juni, September, dan Desember dengan E-ISSN 2549-192X. Pada Desember 2019, Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen mendapatkan akreditasi dengan peringkat Sinta 4. Sejak Edisi Volume 8 No 3 Tahun 2020, proses kerja dan publikasi Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen dipindahkan ke https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jim

Jurnal Inovasi Kreativitas Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran (INKREDIBEL) adalah Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Akses Terbuka yang diterbitkan oleh Badan  Pendidikan Profesi Guru, Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Jurnal ini merupakan jurnal peer-review yang mempublikasikan artikel penelitian (research article)  pendidikan dalam berbagai aspek meliputi media, strategi/model/pendekatan/metode pembelajaran, problematika siswa dalam belajar, pengelolaan kelas termasuk Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, dengan penekanan khusus pada kondisi kelas di Indonesia dan perspektif global. Jurnal ini juga menerima short communication dan systematic literature review terkait bidang pendidikan. Jurnal ini menerbitkan naskah yang ditulis dalam Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Inggris . Jurnal ini menyediakan platform bagi guru/dosen, mahasiswa, dan para pemerhati di bidang pendidikan. 

-

Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan (JKPTB) promotes research in the broad field of Education Research and Technology (including such disciplines as Building Engineering Education, Vocational Education, etc.) with particular respect to Indonesia, but not limited to authorship or topical coverage within the region. Contributions are expected from senior researchers, project managers, research administrators and undergraduate/postgraduate students at advanced stages of their research, representing both public organizations and private industry. Equally, the journal if intended for scholars and students, reseachers working at research organizations and government agencies, and also for enterprises undertaking applied R&D to lead innovations. The editorial contents and elements that comprise the journal include: Theoretical articles Empirical studies Practice-oriented papers Case studies Review of papers, books, and resources. As far as the criteria for evaluating and accepting submissions is concerned, a rigorous review process will be used. Submitted papers will, prior to the formal review, be screened so as to ensure their suitability and adequacy to the journal. In addition, an initial quality control will be performed, so as to ensure matters such as language, style of references and others, comply with the journal´s style. The below mentioned areas are just indicative. The editorial board also welcomes innovative articles that redefine any Vocational and Building Engineering Educational field. Teaching and learning in building engineering and civil engineering education Evaluation, assessment, and certification in building engineering and civil engineering education, human resources management in civil engineering and building engineering education Vocational resources in building engineering and civil engineering education Policy and contemporary issues in building engineering and civil engineering education Other things related to Building Engineering and Civil Engineering Education