Daftar Jurnal Penerbit Universitas Negeri Surabaya

FOCUS AND SCOPE Character Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi (CJPP) accepts manuscript research results in the fields of educational psychology, developmental psychology, clinical psychology, social psychology, industrial & organizational psychology, but not limited to: Personality and Learning Learning Interventions Teaching Strategies Education of Children with Special Needs Education of Gifted Children Counselling in Education Development of Children, Adolescents, Adults, and the Elderly Developmental Problems Parenting Strategies Quality of Life Personality Disorder Behaviour Modification Counselling and Psychotherapy Psychosis Disorders Psychological Intervention Social Transformation Social Intervention Employee Engagement Aggressive Behavior Prosocial Behavior Group Conformity Customer Satisfaction Organizational Leadership Organizational Commitment Work Motivation Work Stress PUBLICATION FREQUENCY This journal is published in January, Mei, September. REVIEWER GUIDELINES The reviewers of Character Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi (CJPP) will receive the manuscript (s) in the form of MS-word soft file. The detailed evaluative comments for the author’s manuscript are needed, and the comments are written directly in the file. CJPP will send this commented manuscript (s) to the author(s), therefore please be as comprehensive, specific, and constructive as possible in your comments. We expect that your comments would be helpful to the author(s) in improving their manuscripts. The following format is suggested for preparing comments for the author(s): 1. Identification of the contribution and major strengths of the paper. Is this paper appropriate for psychology subject? What are the strengths of the paper? What is the main contribution to existing body of psychological knowledge and practice? 2. Major weaknesses of the paper. Does the manuscript provide sufficient information needed? Is there any mistake that should be corrected? Do the authors achieve their stated objectives? What are the major changes that should be made in a revision? 3. Readability Are the references, tables, and figures made and placed appropriately? Are there sections of the manuscript that can be eliminated or condensed? Will the paper be interesting to both academicians and practitioners? How to improve the paper to deal with this issue? 4. Abstract and Title. Is the title appropriate given the content of the paper? Does the abstract contain an accurate and useful summary of the content of the paper? If you, as a reviewer, think that it is necessary to alert the editor​​ to issues that would be inappropriate to be included in the comments to the Author(s), ​​​you are suggested to write a separate note to the editor. DUTIES OF REVIEWER Contribution to Editorial DecisionsPeer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. PromptnessAny selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. ConfidentialityAny manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor. Standards of ObjectivityReviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. Acknowledgement of SourcesReviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Disclosure and Conflict of InterestPrivileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. All articles submitted to Character Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi (CJPP) will be read and reviewed blindly (blind peer review) by peer-reviewers who are the experts in their fields. The Editor may assign the reviewer(s) from the Jurnal Psikologi Teori dan Terapan's peer-reviewers, author(s)' suggestion, or other relevant researchers. The acceptance of an article depends on the novelty of research, significance of the article, truth of the content, the degree of originality, the clarity of description, and the conformity with the objective of this journal. Articles may be accepted without revision, accepted with minor revision, accepted with major revision, or rejected. The results of reviewed articles by reviewers will be notified to the author via email. The author is given an opportunity to revise his or her article based on the reviewers' and editor's suggestion no later than 2 weeks after the email notification. All incoming articles will be checked for authenticity to prevent plagiarism by using turnitin and/or iThenticate anti-plagiarism software. The entire processes from the submission until the publication of articles are free of charge (no article processing and submission charges). All articles published on Jurnal Psikologi Teori dan Terapan are open access by following the Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license. SPONSOR The main sponsors of CJPP: Character Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi are Departement Psychology Universitas Negeri Surabaya AUTHOR FEES This journal charges the following author fees. Article Submission: 0.00 (IDR)Article Publication: 0.00 (IDR)

Jurnal Dialektika Pendidikan IPS merupakan jurnal ilmiah elektronik yang diterbitkan oleh Program Studi S1 Pendidikan IPS FISH Unesa, Surabaya. Adapun fokus dan ruang lingkup jurnal ini adalah: 1. Hasil penelitian praksis Pendidikan IPS (integrasi): Inovasi pembelajaran IPS, Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, Riset Penilaian dan Evaluasi dalam Pendidikan IPS, Pendidikan Nilai dan Karakter dalam IPS, Pembelajaran Mitigasi dan Lingkungan Hidup dalam IPS. 2. Hasil penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial yang berkontribusi terhadap Pendidikan IPS: Seluruh hasil riset ilmu-ilmu sosial yang memiliki keterkaitan dengan konten pada Pendidikan IPS, dan diharuskan terdapat penjelasan di dalam naskah, apa manfaat temuan penelitian tersebut bagi pendidikan IPS. Jurnal Dialektika Pendidikan IPS terbit tiga kali dalam satu tahun, di bulan Maret, Juli dan Nopember. Jurnal kami membuka keterlibatan para penulis untuk mempublikasikan naskah-naskah terbaiknya, dan kami juga menerima reviewer yang memiliki ketertarikan untuk berkerjasama meningkatkan kualitas publikasi dalam jurnal ini melalui proses peer-review. Penulis yang menerbitkan karyanya ke jurnal ini setuju dengan persyaratan berikut: Penulis menyerahkan hak cipta dan memberikan hak penerbitan pertama kepada jurnal, dengan karya yang secara serentak dilisensikan di bawah Lisensi: A Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 4.0 Internasional License yang memungkinkan orang lain membagikan karya dengan pengakuan penerbitan awal dan kepenulisan karya di jurnal ini.

The Journal of Digitalization in Physics Education (JDPE) is an international publication dedicated to advancing research and practices at the intersection of digital technology and physics education. With the rapid evolution of digital tools and resources, this journal serves as a platform for researchers, educators, and practitioners to share insights and innovations that leverage digital technologies in the teaching, learning, and assessment of physics. Starting Vol 1 No 1 April 2025 edition, this journal starts to enforce the special focus on “the utilization and optimization of digital technology in the physics education”. It will support this journal for the indexing process on Scopus in the future. There still is free of charge (APC) for publishing. Please immediately to take this advantage for submitting your best relevant article with that new focus. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: Research & Development in Physics Education Based Digital Technology: Research & Development area explores the creation and testing of new tools, methods, or frameworks that integrate digital technology into physics  education. Researchers create a better, smarter, and more enjoyable way of learning science through the use of digital tools and technology. Research & Development in Physics Education Based Digital Technology in JDPE to enforce the special focus on “the utilization and optimization of digital technology in the science education". ⁠Implementation of Digital Technology in Physics Education: Consisting of implementation research studies on learning and teaching of digital technology in the physics education. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. Implementation of Digital Technology in Physics Education in JDPE to enforce the special focus on “the utilization and optimization of digital technology in the physics education". Issue & Trend of Digital Technology in Physics Education: Consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. Issues and trends in JDPE to enforce the special focus on “the utilization and optimization of digital technology in the physics education". This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in physics education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a bibliometric, literature review, position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. Culture Studies in Physics Education Based Digital Technology: A field of research that looks at howcultural, social, and identity-related factors influence and are influenced by the use of digital technology in physics education. This area examines how learners from different cultural backgrounds experience digital science education—how they interact with technology, how their beliefs or identities affect their learning, and how digital tools reflect or neglect cultural diversity.Digital technology has great potential to improve science education, but if cultural factors are ignored, it may actually widen gaps instead of closing them. Culture studies help ensure digital tools are inclusive, respectful, and effective for diverse learners. The Journal Editorial Board invites any manuscript addressing a relevant science education topic that employs an established and recognized scholarly approach and also impacts or is generalizable to national and international populations. All manuscripts must provide a thorough review of the literature that establishes the research problem or the issue at hand as well as a thorough conclusion that addresses the implications and limitations of the research or argument.

Focus and Scope Disable: Law Review  which provides a forum for academic development and interdisciplinary studies on legal protection and human rights. To that end, this Journal develops innovative studies and promotes critical perspectives on the practice of legal protection and human rights in the context of inclusivity especially on contemporary issues that have global and broad discourse. Disable: Law Review accepts submission from all over the world. Peer Review Process All manuscripts submitted to Realism: Law Review will be read and reviewed blindly (blind peer review) by (a minimum of) 1 peer reviewers who are expert in their field. Manuscript Service Flow can be seen in this page. The Editor may assign the Reviewer(s) from the Realism: Law Review peer reviewers, Author(s) suggestions, other researchers, and/or other Realism: Law Review Editorial Member. The acceptance of an manuscripts depend on the novelty of the research, significance of the article, truth of the content, the degree of originality, the clarity of description, and the conformity with the objective of the journal. Manuscript may be accepted without revision, minor revisions, major revision, or even rejected. The final decision of manuscript acceptance shall be made by the Editorial Board according to reviewers critical comments. The results of reviewed articles by reviewers will be notified to the author via email. The author is given an opportunity to revise his article based on the reviewers' (and editors) suggestion no later than 12 weeks after the email notification. Articles that have been submitted take an average of about 18 weeks to publish. Publication Frequency Disable: Law Review is published three times a year, in Juny and December. Open Access Policy This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Publication Ethics Disable: Law Review has high standards for expected ethical behavior by all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer and the publisher. Disable: Law Review is a peer-reviewed journal, published three times a year by Universitas Negeri Surabaya. It is available online as open access sources as well as in print. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor-in-chief, the Editorial Board, the reviewer, and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication The publication of an article in Disable: Law Review is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific methods. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the editor, the reviewer, the publisher, and the society. As the publisher of Disable: Law Review takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and it recognizes its ethical and other responsibilities. Disable: Law Review committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. Publication decisions The editors of Disable: Law Review are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editors may be guided by the policies of Disable: Law Review editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making publication decisions. Fair Play An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. ConfidentialityThe editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. Disclosure and conflicts of Interest Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Duties of Authors     1 Reporting Standard:   Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. 2 Data Access and Retention:   Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review. They should be prepared to provide such data within a reasonable time. 3 Originality and Plagiarism:   The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. 4 Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication:   An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. 5 Acknowledgment of Sources:   Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. 6 Authorship of the Paper:   Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. 7 Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest:   All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. 8 Fundamental errors in published works:   When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the authors obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. 9 Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects:   If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.   Duties of Editors     1 Fair Play:   An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. 2 Confidentiality:The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. 3 Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest:   Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. 4 Publication Decisions:   The editor board journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. 5 Review of Manuscripts:   The editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. The editor should organize and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer reviewed. The editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.   Duties of Reviewers   1 Contribution to Editorial Decisions:   Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. 2 Promptness:   Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process 3 Standards of Objectivity:   Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. 4 Confidentiality:   Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor. 5 Disclosure and Conflict of Interest:   Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. 6 Acknowledgment of Sources:   Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.   Anti-Plagiarism All articles submitted to Realism: Law Review must be the original work of the author (free of plagiarism). The submitted article has never existed in any media and/or is not being or will be submitted in any media. The author is responsible for the authenticity of the submitted manuscript. All incoming manuscript will be checked for authenticity to prevent plagiarism by using Turnitin, anti-plagiarism software. Any forms of high-level plagiarism will be banned (temporary up to permanent banned).   Archive Policy Disable: Law Review uses the LOCKSS system to create a distributed filing system among participating libraries and allow those libraries to create permanent archives of journals for preservation and restoration purposes. As well as Disable: Law Review submits its content to the Republic of Indonesia's national library database, Garuda (Garba Referral Digital), and several journal indexing institutions, so that data availability is guaranteed and accessible.

Focus and Scope Educational Technology Journal (ETJ) is a scientific journal that contains and disseminate the results of research, in-depth study, and the ideas orinnovative work in the field of science education. The innovative work of the teachers and lecturers of the development of the education sector which is able to make a positive contribution to the schools and educational institutions the focus of this journal.1. Educational Technology2. Curriculum3. Learning Media4. Learning Material5. Learning Environment6. Learning Methods7. Learning Theory8. Learning Design9. Learning Approach10. Learning Model11. Learning Strategies12. Techniques in Learning Peer Review Process All articles submitted to the Eductaional Technology Jorunal will be selected, read, and reviewed in a blind (peer review) who are experts in their field. The acceptance of an article depends on the truth of the content, the degree of originality, clarity of description, and conformity with the objectives of the journal. Publication Frequency Educational Technology Journal (ETJ) is a peer-reviewed journal that is managed and published by Curriculum and Educational Technology, Department, Education Faculty, Universitas Negeri Surabaya. ETJ is published periodically twice a year. Open Access Policy This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. All articles published on ETJ are open access by following the Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license. Full license can be found here.  

-

-

Focus and Scope Education, Language Teaching, Linguistics and Literature ELite Journal is an open peer-reviewed, open access international journal that aims at reporting high-quality empirical and original research contributions in the field of Education, Language Teaching, Linguistics and Literature We publish four times a year, which means that we publish every 3 months. The scope of ELite Journal includes theory and practice in Education, Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, language teachers' training, teaching English as a second/foreign language. ELite Journal also publishes book reviews of potential interest to readers. The publication language of the journal is English and Indonesia. Manuscripts not submitted elsewhere for publication will be considered. if you have already submitted your paper in preprint or repository, please attach the link to your paper for additional information. Papers presented at scientific events are also accepted for publication with the same strict peer-review process. Peer Review Process The author(s) may suggest a list of potential reviewers (title, name, institution, postage address, and email address) maximum of 10 reviewers to review their paper. Authors can also propose that someone does not review (maximum 5 researchers) with a reasonable explanation. Reviewers must have the ORCID id or Google Scholar id. Reviewers may also be invited from journals published by major publishers such as Wiley, Elsevier, or Springer. They must come from different institutions with authors; preferably originating from different countries. Reviewers must not be subject to a conflict of interest involving the author(s) or manuscript(s). Nevertheless, the editor is not obligated to use any reviewers suggested by the author(s). All articles submitted to ELite Journal will be read and reviewed openly (open peer review) by (minimum) 2 Peer-reviewers who are experts in their field. The Editor may assign the Reviewer(s) from the ELite Journal's peer-reviewers, Author(s)' suggestions, other researchers, and/or other Editorial Members. The acceptance of an article depends on the novelty of the research, the significance of the article, the truth of the content, the degree of originality, the clarity of description, and the conformity with the objective of the journal. Articles may be accepted without revision, minor revisions, major revisions, or rejected. The results of reviewed articles by reviewers will be notified to the author via email. The author is given an opportunity to revise his/her article based on the reviewers' suggestion (and editor) no later than 8 weeks after the email notification. All incoming articles will be checked for authenticity to prevent plagiarism by using Turnitin and/or iThenticate anti-plagiarism software. The entire process from submission until the publishing of articles is free of charge (no article processing and submission charges). All articles published in ELite Journal are open access by following the Attribution-ShareAlike license. The full license can be found here. Publication Frequency ELite Journal : International Journal of Education, Language, and Literature is a Journal published online biannually in May and November Screening Plagiarism Every submitted paper will go through plagiarism screening by similarity check software References Management In writing Citation and Bibliography, the authors are strongly advised to use the Reference Management Software with APA style Sponsors we collaborate with the alumni association of the Department of Language and Literature Education, Graduate School of Universitas Negeri Surabaya. IKADIBASTRA Journal History After hiatus for about two years, we regularly published the journal in 2021, and we published a new issue with the new Editorial Board.

Energy: Educational Synergy Journal is a scientific journal published by Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Energy: Educational Synergy Journal aims to provide information from results of applied research in the field of education. results of applied research in the field of education. Educational development, application of learning models and media.   https://issn.perpusnas.go.id/terbit/detail/20250220231403844 //issn.perpusnas.go.id/terbit/detail/20250220231403844